columns

helpless trick..!!

Taher satti

Yesterday’s debate, between Minni Arko Minawi and Ibrahim Al-Sheikh, reveals the (obstacle) that must be overcome consciously and responsibly, and it is the obstacle of defining the standards of the parties to the political process. Only Omar al-Bashir was absent from it, to which Minawi replied that he did not mind including the sheikh’s business partner – and he meant al-Bashir – in the list if the national and international courts acquitted him of the crimes of his era..!!

:: The debate reveals the difference between (the politician and the activist).. The witness is that Ibrahim Al-Sheikh – like all activists – calls all parties that reject the framework agreement the title (Kizan and Falul), including the parties that the Democratic Bloc calls for their inclusion in the political process, and they are the parties that It does not include the Kizan factory and the source of remnants (the Popular Congress).. Yes, the sheikhs of the popular (they are neither Kizan nor remnants), according to the criteria of the leader of the activists, Ibrahim Al-Sheikh..!!

:: By the way, Ghandour, Nafeh and Ali Karti made a mistake by not issuing a statement supporting the framework agreement, and if they had done so, the National Congress today would have been of the democratic civil revolutionary forces allied with Volcker’s parties against all Sudanese parties, including the parties of the Democratic Bloc and Radical Change.. It was blind. The love of power is their insights to the extent that their minds are unable to set logical criteria for their alliances and political stances..!!

:: Ibrahim Al-Sheikh had to be objective in rejecting Minawi’s list, and to clarify the reasons for the rejection while mentioning the required political criteria, and he did not do that in order not to embarrass the remnants of his alliance and (their protectors). That is, describing the list as remnants, so that only Omar al-Bashir was absent from them, or as he said, and it is a broken record, and it no longer entertains even the herd, not to mention the public opinion that is saturated with awareness..!!

:: And not far from the position of Ibrahim Al-Sheikh, we read the position of Yasser Arman, where he says: (The parties to the process were identified from the military and from civilians, and it is sufficient for a democratic transition), so consider how Arman uses the term civilians, on the grounds that he is addressing a people without reason .. the activists The three Volker parties are the ones Arman calls civilians, and they are the ones who determined the parties to the political process in agreement with the soldiers, as if the people elected them to determine..!!

:: Accordingly, there is no way out of this political impasse other than compliance with fair political criteria, by which the parties to the political process are chosen.. Either they are the forces of revolution and change only, or all forces except the National Congress, and there are no Another criterion.. This is the truth rejected by those who lick the Rapid Support bot (at night), and then describe their opponents as lickers of the bot.

helpless trick..!!

Taher satti

Yesterday’s debate, between Minni Arko Minawi and Ibrahim Al-Sheikh, reveals the (obstacle) that must be overcome consciously and responsibly, and it is the obstacle of defining the standards of the parties to the political process. Only Omar al-Bashir was absent from it, to which Minawi replied that he did not mind including the sheikh’s business partner – and he meant al-Bashir – in the list if the national and international courts acquitted him of the crimes of his era..!!

:: The debate reveals the difference between (the politician and the activist).. The witness is that Ibrahim Al-Sheikh – like all activists – calls all parties that reject the framework agreement the title (Kizan and Falul), including the parties that the Democratic Bloc calls for their inclusion in the political process, and they are the parties that It does not include the Kizan factory and the source of remnants (the Popular Congress).. Yes, the sheikhs of the popular (they are neither Kizan nor remnants), according to the criteria of the leader of the activists, Ibrahim Al-Sheikh..!!

:: By the way, Ghandour, Nafeh and Ali Karti made a mistake by not issuing a statement supporting the framework agreement, and if they had done so, the National Congress today would have been of the democratic civil revolutionary forces allied with Volcker’s parties against all Sudanese parties, including the parties of the Democratic Bloc and Radical Change.. It was blind. The love of power is their insights to the extent that their minds are unable to set logical criteria for their alliances and political stances..!!

:: Ibrahim Al-Sheikh had to be objective in rejecting Minawi’s list, and to clarify the reasons for the rejection while mentioning the required political criteria, and he did not do that in order not to embarrass the remnants of his alliance and (their protectors). That is, describing the list as remnants, so that only Omar al-Bashir was absent from them, or as he said, and it is a broken record, and it no longer entertains even the herd, not to mention the public opinion that is saturated with awareness..!!

:: And not far from the position of Ibrahim Al-Sheikh, we read the position of Yasser Arman, where he says: (The parties to the process were identified from the military and from civilians, and it is sufficient for a democratic transition), so consider how Arman uses the term civilians, on the grounds that he is addressing a people without reason .. the activists The three Volker parties are the ones Arman calls civilians, and they are the ones who determined the parties to the political process in agreement with the soldiers, as if the people elected them to determine..!!

:: Accordingly, there is no way out of this political impasse other than compliance with fair political criteria, by which the parties to the political process are chosen.. Either they are the forces of revolution and change only, or all forces except the National Congress, and there are no Another criterion.. This is the truth rejected by those who lick the Rapid Support bot (at night), and then describe their opponents as lickers of the bot.

Back to top button