
Article One:To the Sudanese Government – The Time Has Come for Total Mobilization and a State of Maximum Emergency
Dr. Abdelaziz Al-Zubair Basha
In a harrowing video circulated yesterday across Sudanese social media, rebel RSF militants were seen running over the corpses of fallen Sudanese Armed Forces soldiers with armored vehicles, before proceeding to mutilate the bodies—filming their depravity with pride and disturbing joy. It was not an isolated incident, nor the act of rogue individuals. This was yet another deliberate chapter in a systematic campaign of brutality that has defined the RSF’s war on Sudan.
This is not a conflict between two armed factions. It is an invasion, one that seeks to replace Sudan’s people, dismantle its national institutions, and erase its cultural and historical identity. These crimes are not just battlefield transgressions—they are attacks on the very soul of the nation.
The government of Sudan must now move beyond statements and convenings. It must act. The people are watching. The world is watching. And the blood of the martyrs cries out for justice.
We call upon the Sudanese government to declare total national mobilization, inviting all able-bodied citizens to join the defense of their homeland. Furthermore, it is imperative to announce a state of maximum emergency, enabling swift and coordinated action to secure cities, borders, and critical infrastructure.
Waiting for external mediation has only emboldened the enemy. Relying on the so-called “peace process” has cost us lives and territory. This war was not of our choosing, but we have no choice now but to meet it head-on—with unity, discipline, and the unyielding resolve of a nation that refuses to die.
Let this moment mark the turning point. No more hesitation. No more appeasement. Sudan must now rise in full force to reclaim its dignity and protect its future.
Article Two: To the International Community – How Can You Speak of “Peace” With Those Who Mutilate the Dead?
As calls for “peace talks between the warring factions in Sudan” echo through the corridors of Western diplomacy, a grotesque truth is circulating online: a video filmed and proudly shared by rebel RSF militants shows them running over the corpses of Sudanese soldiers with military vehicles, then desecrating the bodies.
What kind of “peace partner” behaves like this? What sort of “armed faction” glorifies the desecration of the dead?
These are not acts of war—they are acts of terrorism, of extermination, of a militia that has spent the past year abducting civilians, committing mass rape, looting hospitals and markets, burning down heritage sites, and forcibly disappearing thousands. And yet, the international community continues to reduce this horror to the misleading label of a “conflict between two sides.”
This is not a civil war. It is a militarized invasion led by a regional proxy force, aimed at uprooting the Sudanese people and replacing them with a new demographic and political reality through bloodshed.
And yet, the response of much of the international community remains dangerously naive—or willfully complicit. Treating both parties as morally equivalent—offering peace talks while mass graves are being filled—is not neutrality. It is abdication. It is complicity.
The Sudanese people are not asking for foreign armies to fight their battles. They are asking for the truth to be spoken. For justice to be acknowledged. And for global institutions to stop sanitizing war crimes with diplomatic language.
To continue speaking of “both sides” is to give cover to monsters. To call for negotiations without naming the aggressor is to abandon the very idea of international justice.
How many more mutilated bodies will it take before the world stops pretending that this is anything other than a genocidal campaign?


